top of page

So, decision points: Ares II or Pontus II?

  • Oct 8, 2021
  • 4 min read

I love taking risks, especially when they pay off and I am surprised along the

journey.


I took a risk with my first Denafrips purchase, the Ares II DAC. No returns does

not offer much of a security blanket. Still, enough reviewers had praised the

sound, construction and customer service to take a chance. After all, I was not

spending many thousands of dollars like I would on audio gear of similar

reputation.


After a couple of non-critical listening days the surprises started. Many terms can

describe good audio but I’ll keep it to the things that matter most to me: a big

soundstage all around, tonal accuracy, instrument separation and a minimally

“grungy” high end. I don’t want to shudder as musical crescendos are about to

arrive. Fortunately, there was no need to cover my ears with the Ares II.


The Ares II gave me all I expected from reviews. It not just equalled but bettered

the performance of my PS Audio Directstream DAC, and at a fraction of the cost.

I was happy, yes, but I was looking for more. The sound from my rig approached

but did not yet match memories of live acoustic performances.


I was fortunate that by the time the Ares II arrived I already had the Willsenton

R8 tube amp and Klipsch Forte IV horn speakers. I needed a resolving, revealing

system to tell differences up the audio chain.


So how was I to get that elusive “more” that I could not adequately describe?

I could have chased once again after much higher priced gear. Instead, I opted to

test the waters with the Pontus II, next up the Denafrips DAC lineup to the Ares

II. I did not go for the top-of-the-line Denafrips Terminator, despite excellent

reviews, not when I could not return it. My budget limits risk-taking. There are

limits.


So, I risked it with the Pontus II, said to have technology from Denafrips

higher-end DACs. It was double the cost of the Ares II but still did not come close

to insanity pricing.


The Pontus II gave me more of everything I value. It definitely exceeded my

expectations. It was the Ares II on steroids. If you have a resolving system you

can easily appreciate what it does, unless your hearing is deficient or your

hearing aids are broken.


Still, I was looking for that hard-to-define “more”. Maybe “more” was that sense of

presence one feels at a live acoustic performance. I definitely was not looking to

have the musicians in my listening room, a now overused cliche. I wanted to feel

as if I was at a live performance. I was looking for what I call “Thereness.” I

wanted to hear concert-level volumes, power and clarity without distortion or

clipping.


Liking what I had from Denafrips, I started reading reviews of the Iris DDC

(Digital to Digital Converter), a device I was unfamiliar with. Fortunately, YouTube

reviewers came to the rescue with great explanations of what it did, its build

quality and performance.


A DDC is designed to clean up the noise, jitter and other unwanted USB interface

pollution. It’s a pollution control device. Again, the price of just over $500 USD

was worth risking the poverty line. So I got one. Nothing ventured, nothing

gained.


To be deadly honest, I did not expect much from the Iris DDC. If anything smelled

like snake oil, this was likely to be it. Then I was surprised yet again. All the good

Denafrips DAC traits were there with the Iris in the chain. However, this is when a

superhero came on the scene bringing the “more” I wanted.


It was as if Sean Connery, someone to whom I am sometimes unfairly compared,

had come into my listening space and said: “My name is Bond, James Bond.”

Authoritative, clear and very sensual. There he was. Or rather, there it was, the

piece I kept looking for in my audiophile experience. I got the feeling of

“Thereness”.


I was finally in my second row center, first-balcony seat at Orchestra Hall in

Chicago. Sitting practically on top of the orchestra, I felt the blast of effortless

concert-level sound, without distortion, even when all hell breaks loose on Mahler

symphonies.


Anyone who thinks that noise, jitter and timing from USB pollution does not

impact sound quality should experience the Ares II/Iris combo. Better yet, the

Pontus II/Iris pairing.


Not everyone is prone to take a risk on the more expensive Pontus II plus a

DDC, but the rewards are many for the few and the brave. I fortunately did not

have to decide which to keep and which to sell. I have both.



I would definitely recommend getting the Denafrips DAC you can afford, along

with the Iris DDC. I would also recommend the Pontus II over the Ares II. Besides

increased fidelity, it can connect to the Iris DDC with the higher resolution I2S

connector. The Ares II is limited to optical and coax. The Iris USB pollution

control benefits are still there, but can be appreciated to a greater extent via the

I2S connection.



So, decision points: Ares II or Pontus II? A no-brainer. The Pontus II is the clear

choice if you value more of all the good things a Denafrips DAC offers, plus

higher resolution. You’ll never come as close to affordable audio bliss as you now

can with the Pontus II and the Iris. Well, never say never.


My whole rig, not including speakers, cost less than a new PS Audio

Directstream DAC. If that unit is rated at the top by Stereophile, the Denafrips

products deserve similar ratings. My appreciation goes to YouTube reviewers.

They can do so much more than the print media.



I’m using both Denafrips DACs connected to one Iris. The Pontus II routes to my

main system, the Ares II feeds my office. Yes, it can provide pollution control

services for more than one DAC at a time, provided of course you have only one

USB source. Seldom has modest risk yielded so many benefits.




Credit:


Armando R

California, United States



156 Comments


verity evans
verity evans
6 days ago

The origin gives this pattern a nice bit of history. It's always fun seeing older creations remain relevant, just like classic stickman hook content still gets discussed today.

Like

Trong quá trình tìm hiểu các nền tảng giải trí trực tuyến hiện nay, sc88 mang lại cho mình cảm nhận khá tích cực về cách tổ chức nội dung và trải nghiệm sử dụng. Những khu vực như thể thao, casino trực tuyến, slot game, bắn cá và game bài được phân chia hợp lý, giúp người dùng dễ dàng tiếp cận từng loại hình giải trí. Mình nhận thấy giao diện được xây dựng theo hướng gọn gàng, hạn chế sự phức tạp khi có nhiều danh mục cùng xuất hiện. Khi trải nghiệm thực tế, tốc độ tải nội dung tương đối nhanh, thao tác chuyển đổi giữa các khu vực diễn ra nhẹ nhàng và hệ thống…

Like

Sau nhiều lần quan sát giao diện ở những thời điểm khác nhau, RR88 cho mình cảm giác khá rõ ràng về hệ thống điều hướng. Các danh mục thể thao, xổ số, casino trực tuyến và nổ hũ được đặt theo từng nhóm chức năng, giúp giảm thời gian tìm kiếm khi muốn chuyển sang nội dung khác. Mình nhận thấy các khu vực bắn cá, game bài và đá gà cũng được trình bày tách biệt nên dễ theo dõi hơn. Bố cục giữa các phần duy trì sự đồng nhất, tạo cảm giác quen thuộc khi truy cập lại. Trong lúc sử dụng liên tục, hệ thống phản hồi ổn định, thao tác chuyển đổi nhanh và việc…

Like

suzi bai
suzi bai
Aug 06

I totally get the thrill of taking a risk on the Ares II, and it reminds me of how I dive into new game hubs like meccha chameleon xbox both give that unexpected payoff and keep me hooked. Sound and gaming can be surprisingly similar adventures.

Like

Có đợt mình thử xem qua vài nền tảng khác nhau để tìm nơi thao tác ổn trên mobile thay vì chỉ tập trung vào số lượng game đang có. Sau vài lần mở thử, https://pg99.beer/ tạo cảm giác khá thuận vì lúc chuyển từ thể thao sang casino hay nổ hũ không bị cảm giác quá rối mắt. Mình cũng chú ý thêm việc giao diện nhìn khá gọn nên kể cả lúc mở lâu vẫn tương đối dễ bắt nhịp hơn.

Like
bottom of page